Back to Blog home

Is commercial software the salvation of Linux?

Published on Saturday August 06, 2005 by Lorn Potter in Qt KDE | Comments

Eric Laffoon of Kdewebdev fame responds to Timothy R. Butler's piece about KDE needing to move beyond Qt. I just had to post about this.
Thank you, Eric, for expressing this so well.
Qt, the GPL, Business and Freedom

Some of his better comments:

"I have a problem with attempts to depreciate the value of the GPL or arguments that there is a problem with Qt because businesses cannot write closed source software with it for free. Is commercial closed source software essential for Linux success? Is that what we're about now? "

"There used to be an argument against Qt for not being GPL, then for not offering unrestricted free software development on Windows. As of Qt 4 the GPL license applies to Linux, Mac and Windows. The only thing left to attack Qt on is that it's not free for commercial use... Never mind that it's a poor argument and that the objective of FOSS has never been to support corporate welfare for commercial projects."

"Why are open source supporters against a company like Trolltech which has GPL'd their key product? One can hope reason will prevail. Sadly, for some, zealotry will trump any reasoning."

Subscribe to Our Blog

Stay up to date with the latest marketing, sales and service tips and news.

The blog comment system has been migrated to a new platform. If you face any issues, please let us know via feedback@qt.io.