On an NXP i.MX 8 Quad, Android is inferior to Linux in terms of performance (RAM, flash memory) and flexibility, and boot time.
A comparison of 15 different factors left Qt ahead by a small margin, mostly on the back of sorting and filtering criteria.
By developing both applications simultaneously, we were able to get a real handle on the strengths and weaknesses of both Android and Qt. It was close, but we could clearly identify the superior approach.”
The free white paper compares Qt and Android in detail across three criteria:
Framework functionality
Development ease
Development speed
For each criterium, Witekio’s experts explain how each framework performs and offer clear examples as to the strengths and weaknesses of each approach in the context of the development process. You can even find their source codes at the end of the white paper!
The Android robot is reproduced or modified from work created and shared by Google and used according to terms described in the Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution License.
Qt Group includes The Qt Company Oy and its global subsidiaries and affiliates.