Cross-platform software libraries and APIs
Qt Creator IDE and productivity tools
UI Design tool for UI composition
for Qt projects
Digital advertising for UI apps
Usage intelligence for embedded devices
GUI test automation
Code coverage analysis
Test results management and analysis
Software static code analysis
Software architecture verification
The latest version of Qt.
Make the most of Qt tools, with options for commercial licensing, subscriptions, or open-source.
Explore Qt features, the Framework essentials, modules, tools & add-ons.
The project offers PySide6 - the official Python bindings that enhance Python applications.
Qt empowers productivity across the entire product development lifecycle, from UI design and software development to quality assurance and deployment. Find the solution that best suits your needs.
Insight into the evolution and importance of user-centric trends and strategies.
Learn how to shorten development times, improve user experience, and deploy anywhere.
Tips on efficient development, software architecture, and boosting team happiness.
Get the latest resources, check out upcoming events, and see who’s innovating with Qt.
A wealth of Qt knowledge at your fingertips—discover your ideal learning resource or engage with the community.
Whether you're a beginner or a seasoned Qt pro, we have all the help and support you need to succeed.
Conceptionally visual verifications are a hybrid form of property verifications and screenshot verifications. Both types of checks are combined into a single complex algorithm to find the best possible match.
Unlike screenshot verifications, they do not just treat the rendered screen content as a single surface. Instead, the area is divided and compared per individual UI control. Rendered pixels, position, size and content properties will be compared against expected values.
Visual verifications can check the on-screen display of dialogs, whole application windows or subsections. By default, all checks will be performed in a strict manner that does not allow for changes in state, layout and rendering.
However, an editor is implemented that allows modifications of individual checks to make them more tolerant.
One example where visual verifications are useful is when we need to verify that a dialog (or Web page) as a whole still shows the expected text and images (and no more) with the exact layout and UI theme differing between respective client platforms.
When a verification point has been added any screenshot that has been taken are saved along with object property values and geometries, as part of the expected results.
When the test script is replayed, whenever Squish reaches a visual verification point it takes a snapshot of the relevant widget and compares this with the corresponding snapshot that it originally took, and reports success or failure for the verification point depending on whether the snapshots are considered to be the same or not.
In addition, if a visual verification fails Squish saves the new (and different) snapshot for later inspection in the log. Which allows us to view the differences between the expected snapshot and the actual snapshot by right-clicking the failure message in the test log view.
Through wildcards for property values, tolerance ranges for geometries and correlation threshold for image data; Squish can show the differences between snapshots side-by-side and allowing for tuning of the comparison through changes of the check settings.
Qt Group includes The Qt Company Oy and its global subsidiaries and affiliates.