Expert Insights: Are You Overpaying for GUI/UI Testing?
Testing tools and frameworks are often chosen with good intentions: they are familiar, flexible, or initially inexpensive. What is less visible is how testing costs accumulate over time , not just in licensing, but in engineering effort, maintenance, and opportunity cost.
This guide looks beyond upfront pricing to examine the real cost of GUI testing as systems grow and evolve. Drawing on first-hand insights from teams across multiple industries and platforms, it highlights the warning signs that testing effort is starting to outweigh its value, and offers a practical framework for deciding when a different approach is needed.
For this guide, we interviewed Karim Boussema, Solutions Engineer at Qt Group, drawing on his first-hand experience across dozens of real-world development projects. His perspective reveals common GUI testing patterns, recurring pain points, and the moments when teams realize their current approach no longer scales.
The result is a practical reality check for teams developing interfaces built with various technologies and frameworks, and a clearer view of when it’s time to rethink how GUI testing is done.
Click "Get Document" to read the whole guide. No sign up required.
Get DocumentOh, here is more
Expert Insights: GUI Testing Best Practices for Qt-Built Interfaces
Many Qt teams initially rely on manual testing or general-purpose open-source tools such as Selenium...
Get Document
Whitepaper: The State of Software Quality in Safety-Critical Industries
48% of engineering leaders in safety-critical industries say architectural drift is a primary driver...
Get Document