Imagine: Your cooking recipe has been cut into 1,000 pieces and been scattered all over the kitchen - and YOU want to host an exquisite dinner party tonight!
Even the best ingredients, which are already on stock, and a helpful team of experts from around the world won't be able to help you get this recipe right and the party a success.
This is more or less what can happen in software development, without anyone deliberately sabotaging you, simply due to creeping processes and issues that weren't identified in time.
We want to dedicate this blog post to a very common problem in today's software development: Spaghetti Code, a severe form of code smells (aka technical debt). We want to shed light on its background, highlight the consequences of not discovering and untangling it as quickly as possible, and pave the way for how we can untangle it or, even better, avoid it alltogether.
What is Spaghetti Code?
Spaghetti code describes software that has become unpredictable, tangled, and difficult to understand. Code that was once clean and structured grows into a network of interdependencies, scattered logic and unclear ownership over time. It becomes harder to maintain, slower to change and more expensive to refactor. Spaghetti Code is a form of technical debt.
Spaghetti Code is often recognized by:
- Logic spread over multiple modules
- Bidirectional dependencies (X calls Y and vice versa)
- Hard-to-trace control flow
- Slow developer progress
- Rising defect rates
“Spaghetti Code basically means logic is spread across multiple locations in the project. Each of these locations communicates to many or even all of the others, which makes the code very difficult to read, very difficult to understand, and very difficult to maintain.”
Sven Hager, Qt Quality Assurance
Why does Spaghetti Code Happen?
It usually doesn’t start that way. Source code becomes spaghetti over time due to:
- Growth of features and complexity
- Changing requirements
- More developers joining – growth of team or project
- Missing documentation
- Lack of architecture or maintainability rules
- Hot fixes
In short: The human brain has limited capacity. Reading code is always harder than writing code—so without structure, complexity grows beyond what people can handle.
Why is Spaghetti Code a Problem?
Spaghetti code doesn’t just slow teams down—it gradually erodes the ability to understand how the system behaves. As emphasized earlier, reading code is significantly harder than writing it because understanding requires mental reconstruction of intent, side effects and flow. Once the logic is scattered across modules in unpredictable ways, a developer must mentally juggle too many pieces at once. That cognitive overload leads to more mistakes, slower delivery and higher onboarding costs.
In safety-critical domains—like automotive, medical, or industrial control systems—the stakes are even higher. Bugs in these systems can cause hardware to misbehave, and misbehavior can escalate into real-world danger. Many defects in such systems ultimately trace back to human error caused by source code that had become too hard to understand.
Summarized: Spaghetti code isn’t just peanuts—it can become a genuine risk factor.
How to Fix Spaghetti Code?
The good news: you rarely need to throw it all away. You can untangle spaghetti code with a structured approach:
Step 1: Detect that there is a problem
You'll feel it before you see it: tasks take longer, simple changes create surprising side effects, and developers hesitate to touch certain areas. That's your first red flag.
Step 2: Create an architectural model
Define which components your system should have, how they should communicate and what belongs where. This part is manual—but absolutely essential.
Step 3: Map the existing code to this architecture
Mapping source files to their intended components already reveals inconsistencies. Developers often realize during this step that certain modules contain logic they shouldn’t, or that responsibilities have drifted.
Step 4: Use architecture verification to surface violations
Now automation kicks in. Architecture verification tools compare the implementation against the intended design and highlight violations—like forbidden dependencies or cross-calls that shouldn't exist or non-existing calls that actually should exist. This is exactly where spaghetti code becomes visible.
Step 5: Systematically refactor
Once the hotspots are identified, refactoring becomes intentional and guided. You remove unwanted dependencies, relocate logic to the proper components and clean up the structure without rewriting the entire system.
This process turns a “tangled mess” into a controllable, interpretable system again. Architecture verification tools automate the detection of structural violations and help remove unexpected dependencies and tangled logic.
How to Prevent Spaghetti Code from Day One?
You can never avoid it entirely, but you can minimize the risk dramatically by following this pattern:
Start with architecture before writing any code
In an ideal world, you define your components, boundaries and communication rules before a single line of code exists. This prevents accidental coupling from the start.
Use static code analysis continuously
Architecture verification is part of static analysis—make sure everyone understands they work together.
- Architecture verification guards the macro-level (components and dependencies).
- Code metrics and static analysis guard the micro-level (functions, complexity, bad patterns).
Together they catch different kinds of “spaghetti” early.
Enforce architectural rules automatically
Once your architecture is written down and connected to the code, automation becomes your safeguard. Violations are detected immediately, so spaghetti-like structures never sneak in unnoticed.
Reduce developer cognitive load
By keeping components clean and boundaries predictable, new developers onboard faster and fewer mistakes occur—because your system remains understandable.
The Bottom Line
Spaghetti code is a common, well-known anti-pattern. If left unattended, it becomes technical debt with real financial and operational consequences. In extreme cases, it can even contribute to dangerous behavior in systems that control physical hardware.
With the right combination of:
- clear architecture,
- continuous verification,
- static code analysis and
- structured refactoring,
organizations can both untangle existing spaghetti code and prevent new spaghetti code from forming. The effort pays off in faster development, fewer bugs, easier onboarding and more predictable long-term maintenance.
Let´s Get in Touch
Contact us anytime – our experts are more than happy to help you fulfill your needs. Further information and even an interactive tour how our sophisticated architecture verification tool looks, can be found here.
If you are interested in receiving our community news regularly, we recommend our newsletter subscription.
